Martin Ruiz - My Random Walk

My Random Walk
Filed under

social media

Is Google Buzz really Google Hype?

I got my Buzz this afternoon just before the feeling of being left out set in.  Excited and snowed in, with nothing better to do, I gave it a try.  It felt familiar and uninteresting.  But what is interesting, is how they're getting it out.  Here are a few quick thoughts.

Why in GMail?
I suppose Buzz was integrated into GMail to quickly build up a user base.  Remember 'Google Contacts' had already been made a separate service, so GMail's contacts (default social network) is clearly not the reason.  You might think it's because they thought it made sense to treat it like an inbox.  But it might make equal if not more sense to put it in Google Wave.  However, Google Wave hasn't had much traction, so stuffing Buzz in there would have instantly killed it.

If this scheme works, Google will likely continue to use GMail as it's Trojan's Horse to push out new products, especially social products... even if it makes no other sense.

Orkut? Total Buzz kill
While Buzz is clearly a Social Media move for Google, they've been careful not to mention Orkut and Buzz in the same sentence.  Incidentally, Orkut has never been given the 'G' stamp of approval... GOrkut or Google Orkut just don't exist.

Aggregation is stupid but it always sounds good
Next, there's the aggregation of your social streams.  Twitter, Flickr etc.

Social Media aggregation just doesn't seem to work.  But for some reason it never stops sounding like a good idea.  Co-mingling your social circles is like taking both your parents AND your in-laws on a cruise vacation.  That is such a bad idea. 

For now, Buzz is just a simpler version of FriendFeed...  

Buzz vs Twitter
But whatever happened to FriendFeed?  Well other than being acquired by Facebook, not much.  It's not getting much attention these days.  In fact, Buzz is the only reason I've gone back to FriendFeed in months.  Back when we did know FriendFeed, it wasn't because of it's superior ideas and technology, but because it was fighting with Twitter.

Google will no doubt keep talking about Twitter to build more buzz (for Buzz)... bad pun, I know.

So is Buzz really Hype?
Well I can say that unlike Wave and Orkut, Google has done a careful if not clever job of getting the Buzz out.  It's more marketing and positioning than technology or innovation.

What do you guys think?

(photo via Thomas Hawk flickr)

Share via  //  Retweet Loading mentions  1127 views
Filed under  //  featured   social media  
Comments (0)
Posted 29 days ago

Cirque du Twitter

Hakr, Ben Sandofsky, of Twitter produced this video representing the growth and changes of the Twitter code base.  Checkout http://vis.cs.ucdavis.edu/~ogawa/codeswarm/ to create your own.

Share via  //  Retweet Loading mentions  1204 views
Filed under  //  social media  
Comments (0)
Posted 1 month ago

My fave apps of 2009 are @foursquare @googlevoice @dailybooth @socialscope @posterous

The themes this year... fun and simplicity.

@foursquare --- it's like a facebook game only both fun and useful.  also sparking up consumer spending... well that's not too good:( share your fave places and restaurants.  friendme 

@googlevoice --- combined with gmail... just damn.  Simple, searchable, transcribed, managed vmail... oh yeah, a freemium beauty too.

@dailybooth --- remember when twitter was fun. stupid is fun and dailybooth is ... :) friendme

@socialscope --- kicked twitterberry, ubertwitter, facebook app, and that stinking foursquare browser app off my Blackberry.  Thank goodness... more memory for photos.

@posterous --- these guys are killing it.  it's a clever blogging platform... simple too.  Checkout the mathematical proof it's better than friendfeed+tumblr+twitpic+pingfm... http://martinruiz.posterous.com/calculus-of-blogging-and-social-media-platfor

Looking forward to 2010.

Share via  //  Retweet Loading mentions  671 views
Filed under  //  featured   social media   technology  
Comments (0)
Posted 2 months ago

Twitter gives traders virtual open outcry

via ft.com

I was surprised to find out that the CME Group had almost 800,000 followers on twitter.

Typically, traders use Bloomberg, AIM, Email, and Phones to communicate trading ideas/rumors and deal information. Twitter is interesting in this context for several reasons:

1. "public timeline" - hence transparent and more inclusive. institutional and retail investors in the same space. Information publicly available in real-time.

2. "private if necessary" - Direct Messages (DMs)

3. "open" - The api can help us collect and harvest the value in the information, and promote innovation.

Concern... Even more than the "noisy" information on Twitter, my main concern is the reliability of the platform. Twitter needs to put out a rock solid SLA(service level agreement) and platform.  I think they will:)

Share via  //  Retweet Loading mentions  696 views
Filed under  //  finance   social media  
Comments (0)
Posted 5 months ago

Real-time Social Web is Anti-Social

image via cote


"Real-time" is for machines.  That's a thought rolling in my head today.  I'm thinking of possibly doing a long post some time soon, but in the meantime, I'll share a few "random" thoughts.

Professionally, I design and develop real-time trading systems.  I see strong parallels between the evolution of real-time trading systems on wall street and evolution of the real-time social web. 

The social web is at an inflection point, as it deals with "real-time".  "real-time" search in Twitter.  "real-time" aggregation in FriendFeed and so on.  There appears to be enormous value, but we're struggling to harness that value, and it's quickly overwhelming us.

I'll begin with a very brief evolution of real-time trading systems.

Trading
In the beginning, users are amused by real-time data.  In fact it does add a lot of value.   We show real-time prices in trading systems,  User reacts, points, clicks... trades.

Users realize the advantages of its immediacy, so naturally they want more.  Follow more companies, get more prices and other company data in real-time, trade more etc.

At some point there are too many companies, too many prices, too many decisions, not enough screen real-estate,and slow humans:)

Now we introduce the machines... In my case, trading systems that consume massive amounts of real-time data, make decisions, while hiding the complexities and details.

Social Web - same path
For the social web, you might start with Twitter Search.  You follow a hash tag or two (2 companies).  Or maybe you follow a few friends.

Seems interesting, so you want to track the same hash tag in other social sources, say Delicious.  Or maybe you want to follow more people.

You're impressed so you want to track more tags without compromising speed.  No one wants stale data.

Suddenly, you find yourself following too many topics, too many people, you can't decide which conversations to join etc.  You can't possibly process each bit, tweet, message...

So you turn to the machines.

But now you're further away from the humans... and therefore anti-social.

Is this bad?
Not necessarily.  Moreover, it doesn't have to be anti-social.  My experience in finance shows me the way.

Algorithmic trading systems do 99% of the heavy lifting.  They trade behind the scenes according to rules that react to real-time information.  They're effectively complex event processing engines.  Now this is key.  Great Algorithmic trading systems are designed to interrupt humans when they need help.  In other words, where humans add value.  These would be "exceptions" or situations where there's a lot of ambivalence.

Possible solution and future of Real-time Social Web
The Real-time social web will, at some point, need it's version of an "algorithmic trading system".  Effectively, hiding but still processing all the real-time information of interest... then interrupting you when it needs your help or when you can add value.  Some of this is happening today with tools like Twitturly, that aggregate, filter and rank stories/links mentioned in twitter.

Like trading engines, social engines might have "behind the scenes rules" and "exceptions"

Behind the scene rules
- Retweet link every 2 hours until 25 percent of my readership has read my post
- Tweet link only after 10 percent of my followers are online, based on their last tweet times
- Introduce followers that ReTweet my links
- Retweet old stories during down times
- Tweet posts with tags that match trending topics
- Retweet until your post gets a comment

Exceptions
- Notify me to create new post if ReTweet count is too low
- Have me choose a specific post to tweet if too many posts tags match trends
- more than 5 people ask me a question that matches keywords
- let me know which one of my followers is posting the most
- Notify me when when my 10 favorite friends are online
- Alert me when any of my friends mentions a vacation or wedding

The Technology might already exist where Trading and Social Web intercept - "News"
Interestingly, the technology exists, albeit, too expensive for the average social networker... but probably priced right for corporate brands.  Financial Services shops already use complex event processing engines like StreamBase and Progress/Apama to process price signals but also News stories in real-time.  Processing news is a really tough problem that I won't get into here.  However, I have a hunch that harnessing the real-time social web is this way is actually "easier" and less "risky".

Anyone want to team up on this bad boy? could be fun!

Afterword - Ultra High Frequency Trading - Ultra High Frequency Social Networking
In the past few years there's been an increasing focus on Ultra High Frequency Trading or Low Latency Trading in Finance.  Sub milli-second trading.  Faster data, Faster reaction times.  The basic idea is that there's value in reacting first or taking advantage of sub milli-second behavior or phenomena.  Things are developing quickly in this space.  This could also be where the real-time social web will head toward.  Perhaps I'll speculate on what the ultra high frequency social web might look like, in a future post.

What do you think about the Real-time Social Web?

 

Share via  //  Retweet Loading mentions  706 views
Filed under  //  featured   social media  
Comments (2)
Posted 7 months ago

Tracking The Life And Death Of News


Top 50 threads in the news cycle with highest volume for the period Aug. 1 to Oct. 31, 2008. The total number of posts was constant through the period; peaks represent stories that took up the largest proportion of all posts at a given time. (Credit: Kleinberg group)

"As more and more news appears on the Internet as well as in print, it becomes possible to map the global flow of news by observing it online. Using this strategy, Cornell computer scientists have managed to track and analyze the "news cycle" -- the way stories rise and fall in popularity."

Share via  //  Retweet Loading mentions  400 views
Filed under  //  science   social media  
Comments (0)
Posted 7 months ago

Never Leave Home w/o Daniel's Social Media Hardware Bag

Jacks, power, adapters, and tons of absolutely necessary gadgetry.

- Kodak Zi6 digital camera (HD with batteries and removable 16 gigabyte SD card)
- Quickpod tripod (Tall enough to see over people’s heads)
- Ultra wide angle lens for digital camera
- Olympus digital audio recorder with USB
- Macbook with special carrying case
- RGB to iPhone cable
- USB speakers
- Projector
- 1 to 3 mini power strip ($1 at Walmart)
- Verizon mobile broadband card (always productive)
- DIY Phone to projector gadget (phone2projector.com)

list via the hopkinson report

Share via  //  Retweet Loading mentions  367 views
Filed under  //  gadgets   social media  
Comments (0)
Posted 7 months ago

Scitable tackling traditional media and learning #hackedu

Read "A New Model for Digital Publishing ... From an Academic Journal?" on Advertising Age. (article)

Scitable is Social Network meets Wikipedia. A "trusted" alternative to Wikipedia for Science. Scitable also has guided lessons called "Learning Paths".

Share via  //  Retweet Loading mentions  536 views
Filed under  //  hackedu   science   social media  
Comments (0)
Posted 7 months ago

My 13-year-old Daughter talks about Twitter


Morgan Stanley recently released some research from their 15-year-old intern about Twitter.  One data point is not enough to make this interesting, so I encourage moms, dads, or anyone that knows a teenager to ask them about Twitter.  You'll discover some of the curious social media habits *some* teens have.

I asked my 13-year-old daughter about it and here's what she had to say.

- No one(her friends) uses Twitter because there are too many other things to use out there.

- We use Facebook to share pictures and Twitter has none.

- I invited my friends to Facebook because you (that's me) use Facebook.

- All my friends use AIM. *ALL*

If this means anything and if you'll allow me, I'll draw a few conclusions.

1. Influence: Parents, while perhaps not as much as peers, have some influence on what teenagers use online.

2. User Interfaces: Twitter apps/UI's might be a serious barrier to entry.  A UI with integrated media (in-line photos/videos), also easy to share and comment, might appeal to teens.

3. Groups: The AIM usage leads me to believe that 1-to-1 texting and group chatting is popular.  Twitter clearly is not that.  Twitter groups might help. 

4. Texting: Twitter's DM(direct messsage) feels counter to what Twitter is, so they might not be inclined to use it.  A better DM interface might help.

5. Texting: Given the popularity of texting, DM's from address book seems like a good feature.  The alternative is to remember Twitter handles.

Share via  //  Retweet Loading mentions  299 views
Filed under  //  featured   social media  
Comments (0)
Posted 7 months ago

Calculus of Blogging and Social Media Platforms

Image showing an integral as the area of a reg...

Image via Wikipedia

I've been experimenting with posterous these past few days.  I already use Tumblr, FriendFeed, Twitter, and a few other platforms... which got me thinking about the relationship between them.

I was stricken by the fundamental difference between Posterous and Tumblr.  Both are blogging platforms, but Posterous is a publisher(via AutoPost) and Tumblr is an aggregator(like FriendFeed).  Both allow you to take full view of your online activity.  I haven't decided which approach I like more.

Below is a fun attempt at describing some of these relationships.  Please forgive some of my calculation errors:)

Posterous = blogging + publisher
Tumblr = blogging + aggregator
FriendFeed = aggregator

Wordpress = Typepad = Blogger = blogging

def: max = best feature of

max(Posterous) = AutoPost ... the publishing bit
max(Tumblr) = Theme-ing
max(FriendFeed) = Aggregator

conjecture: max(blogging) = min(blogging) = boring

Posterous > TwitPic
Posterous > Ping.fm

aggregator and publisher are on opposite sides of spectrum.  But both can be used to follow one's streams.

so

publisher = - aggregator

Posterous - blogging = - ( Tumblr - blogging )

Tumblr ~ FriendFeed

Posterous !~ FriendFeed

Posterous - blogging = publisher = -aggregator = - FriendFeed
 
and so on...

Got any equations involving Twitter, Facebook etc. ?

Related articles by Zemanta

Share via  //  Retweet Loading mentions  322 views
Filed under  //  featured   social media  
Comments (0)
Posted 8 months ago
Clicky